Reliability of anthropometric measurements in overweight and lean subjects: consequences for correlations between anthropometric and other variables
- 31 May 2000
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Obesity
- Vol. 24 (5), 652-657
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801216
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sagittal abdominal diameter compared with other anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular riskInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Impairment of health and quality of life in people with large waist circumferenceThe Lancet, 1998
- Ratio of waist circumference to height is strong predictor of intra-abdominal fatBMJ, 1996
- Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sampleBMJ, 1995
- Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: Best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and womenThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- INTERVAL ESTIMATES FOR CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS CORRECTED FOR WITHIN-PERSON VARIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR STUDY DESIGN AND HYPOTHESIS TESTINGAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1988
- The Influence of Body Fat Distribution on the Incidence of Diabetes Mellitus: 13.5 Years of Follow-up of the Participants in the Study of Men Born in 1913Diabetes, 1985
- Distribution of adipose tissue and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: a 12 year follow up of participants in the population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden.BMJ, 1984
- Abdominal adipose tissue distribution, obesity, and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: 13 year follow up of participants in the study of men born in 1913.BMJ, 1984
- Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 YearsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1974