Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 59 (3), 265-273
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.015
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortalityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- Further evidence concerning the use of a clinical comorbidity index with ICD-9-CM administrative dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: A responseJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of carePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbiditiesJAMA, 1988
- Accuracy of Diagnostic Coding for Medicare Patients under the Prospective-Payment SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Risk Adjusting Health Care Outcomes: A Methodologic ReviewMedical Care Review, 1986