Resolving the impasse on hospital scale economics: a new approach
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Economics
- Vol. 27 (3), 286-296
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849500000112
Abstract
The existence of scale economies in hospitals in important for both public and managerial policy, yet production and cost function studies have found conflicting evidence. More recently, more sophisticated studies have typically found scale diseconomies, which is inconsistent with the views of industry participants and observers. In the early 1980s. California deregulated both private and public health insurance (Medical), which provides a natural laboratory for examining hospital efficiency. Using Stigler's original and multivariate survivor analysis, we resolve the conflict in favour of scale economies, and reconcile the controversy. The survivorship methodology in simple to apply, and a useful tool in conjunction with statistical cost and production studies.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Geographic Market Definition under the U. S. Department of Justice Merger GuidelinesThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1987
- Is there a competitive market for hospital services?Journal of Health Economics, 1986
- The determinants of hospital size: a survivor analysisApplied Economics, 1986
- The Extent of the MarketThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1985
- HOSPITAL OWNERSHIP AND PERFORMANCEEconomic Inquiry, 1985
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Specification Error in the Estimation of Hospital Cost FunctionsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1980
- Optimal Scale in Medical Practice: A Survivor AnalysisThe Journal of Business, 1974
- "Behavioural" Cost Functions for HospitalsCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1971
- The Survival Technique and the Extent of Suboptimal CapacityJournal of Political Economy, 1964