Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: Comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis
- 1 November 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Pathology
- Vol. 177 (3), 275-283
- https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1711770310
Abstract
In some studies of breast cancer, quantitation of immunohistochemically highlighted microvessel ‘hot spots’ has been shown to be a powerful prognostic tool. However, the antibody used, the number and size of the ‘hot spots’ assessed, and the stratification of patients into high and low vascular groups vary between studies. Furthermore, little is known about the relationship between microvessel density and other vascular parameters. These uncertainties and the laborious nature of the technique make it unsuitable for diagnostic practice. Both manual and computerized image analysis techniques were used in this study to examine the relationship between microvessel density and the vascular parameters in different sized microscopic fields in a pilot series of 30 invasive breast carcinomas. Automated pixel analysis of immunohistochemical staining, Chalkley point counting, and observer subjective vascular grading were also assessed as more rapid methods of measuring tumour vascularity. A Chalkley count was also performed on a further 211 invasive breast carcinomas. Significant correlations were observed between manual microvessel density and luminal perimeter (r=0·6, P=0·0004), luminal area (r=0·56, P=0·002), and microvessel number (r=0·57, P=0·0009) by computerized analysis. There were also significant correlations between the microscopic hot spots of 0·155 mm2 and 0.848 mm2 for microvessel number (r=0·81, P>0·00005), luminal perimeter (r=0·78, Pr=0·65, P=0·0001). In addition, a significant correlation was observed between microvessel density and both subjective vascular grade (P=0·002) and Chalkley count (P=0·0001). A significant reduction in overall survival was observed between patients stratified by Chalkley count in both a univariate (P=0·02) and a multivariate (P=0·05) analysis in the 211 invasive breast carcinomas. These findings show that Chalkley counting is a rapid method of quantifying tumour angiogenesis and gives independent prognostic information which might be useful in diagnostic practice.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aetiological factors in benign breast diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Angiogenesis and Risk of Breast Cancer in Women With Fibrocystic DiseaseJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1994
- Vascular density and the response of breast carcinomas to mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993
- Assessment of tumour vascularity as a prognostic factor in lymph node negative invasive breast cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993
- Is the relationship between angiogenesis and metastasis in breast cancer real?Surgical Oncology, 1992
- Angiogenesis and regressing cutaneous malignant melanomaThe Lancet, 1992
- Heterogeneity of the endothelial cell and its role in organ preference of tumour metastasisTrends in Pharmacological Sciences, 1991
- Tumor interactions with the vasculature: angiogenesis and tumor metastasisBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer, 1990
- What Is the Evidence That Tumors Are Angiogenesis Dependent?JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990
- Morphometric evaluation of microvessels surrounding hyperplastic and neoplastic mammary lesionsBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1988