Prevalence of wasting among under 6-month-old infants in developing countries and implications of new case definitions using WHO growth standards: a secondary data analysis
Open Access
- 2 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 96 (11), 1008-1013
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.191882
Abstract
Objectives To determine wasting prevalence among infants aged under 6 months and describe the effects of new case definitions based on WHO growth standards. Design Secondary data analysis of demographic and health survey datasets. Setting 21 developing countries. Population 15 534 infants under 6 months and 147 694 children aged 6 to under 60 months (median 5072 individuals/country, range 1710-45 398). Wasting was defined as weight-for-height z-score < -2, moderate wasting as -3 to <-2 z-scores, severe wasting as z-score <-3. Results Using National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) growth references, the nationwide prevalence of wasting in infant under-6-month ranges from 1.1% to 15% (median 3.7%, IQR 1.8-6.5%; similar to 3 million wasted infants < 6 months worldwide). Prevalence is more than doubled using WHO standards: 2.0-34% (median 15%, IQR 6.2-17%; similar to 8.5 million wasted infants < 6 months worldwide). Prevalence differences using WHO standards are more marked for infants under 6 months than children, with the greatest increase being for severe wasting (indicated by a regression line slope of 3.5 for infants < 6 months vs 1.7 for children). Moderate infant-6-month wasting is also greater using WHO, whereas moderate child wasting is 0.9 times the NCHS prevalence. Conclusions Whether defined by NCHS references or WHO standards, wasting among infants under 6 months is prevalent in many of the developing countries examined in this study. Use of WHO standards to defi ne wasting results in a greater disease burden, particularly for severe wasting. Policy makers, programme managers and clinicians in child health and nutrition programmes should consider resource and risk/benefit implications of changing case defi nitions.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Parent Perception of Healthy Infant and Toddler GrowthClinical Pediatrics, 2009
- New WHO growth standards: roll-out needs more resourcesThe Lancet, 2009
- Management of acute moderate and severe childhood malnutritionBMJ, 2008
- Implication of New WHO Growth Standards on Identification of Risk Factors and Estimated Prevalence of Malnutrition in Rural Malawian InfantsPLOS ONE, 2008
- Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequencesThe Lancet, 2008
- Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capitalThe Lancet, 2008
- Management of severe acute malnutrition in childrenThe Lancet, 2006
- Comparison of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmesPublic Health Nutrition, 2006
- A Review of Methods to Detect Cases of Severely Malnourished Children in the Community for Their Admission into Community-Based Therapeutic Care ProgramsFood and Nutrition Bulletin, 2006
- Feeding by numbers: an ethnographic study of how breastfeeding women understand their babies' weight chartsInternational Breastfeeding Journal, 2006