Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID)—Rationale, design, and methods
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 75 (7), 470-475
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80583-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillator compared with antiarrhythmic drug treatment in cardiac arrest survivors (the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg)American Heart Journal, 1994
- Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS): Study design and organizationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Effects of Prophylactic Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 1993
- Dangerous Ventricular Arrhythmias -- Can We Predict Drug Efficacy?New England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- A Comparison of Seven Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients with Ventricular TachyarrhythmiasNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Randomized antiarrhythmic drug therapy in survivors of cardiac arrest (the CASCADE study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Clinical Performance of the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Electrocardiographic Documentation of 101 Spontaneous DischargesPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Sudden coronary death in the United States: 1980-1985.Circulation, 1989
- CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SOTALOL FOR ONE YEAR AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONThe Lancet, 1982
- Termination of Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias with an Implanted Automatic Defibrillator in Human BeingsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980