Abstract
Several attempts have been made to compute electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of biomolecules, using motional models or simulated trajectories to describe dynamics. Ideally, the simulated trajectories should capture “fast” (picosecond) snapshots of spin-probe rotations accurately, while being lengthy enough to ensure a proper Fourier integration of the time-domain signal. It is the interplay of the two criteria that poses computational challenges to the method. In this context, an analysis of the spin-probe and protein conformational sampling and equilibration, with different force fields and with explicit solvent, may be a useful attempt. The present work reports a comparative study of the effect of the molecular dynamics (MD) force field on conformational sampling and equilibration in two spin-labeled T4 lysozyme (T4L) variants, N40C and K48C. Ensembles of 10× 3 ns-trajectories per variant and per force field (OPLS/AMBER and AMBER99) are analyzed for a reliable assessment of convergence and sampling. It is found that subtle site-dependent differences in spin-probe rotations and torsions are more readily captured in the AMBER99 trajectories than in the OPLS/AMBER simulations. On the other hand, sampling and equilibration are found to be better with the OPLS/AMBER force field at equal trajectory lengths. Figure: Left panel: The spin-probe R1 ring and the spin-probe Euler angles Ω, θ and Φ. Middle panel: Illustration of the “diffusion in a cone” model for the spin-probe motion: snapshots of helix B and of the R1 ring in N40C, taken at 0.3 ps intervals from AMBER trajectory 1. Right panel: The N40C mutant with the spin label (solid mode), solvated in a cubic box.