Is Technological Change In Medicine Worth It?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 20 (5), 11-29
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.5.11
Abstract
Medical technology is valuable if the benefits of medical advances exceed the costs. We analyze technological change in five conditions to determine if this is so. In four of the conditions--heart attacks, low-birthweight infants, depression, and cataracts--the estimated benefit of technological change is much greater than the cost. In the fifth condition, breast cancer, costs and benefits are about of equal magnitude. We conclude that medical spending as a whole is worth the increased cost of care. This has many implications for public policy.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Trends in treatment and outcomes for acute myocardial infarction: 1975–1995American Journal Of Medicine, 2001
- The Technology of Birth: Is It Worth It?Forum for Health Economics and Policy, 2000
- The value of mental health care at the system level: the case of treating depression.Health Affairs, 1999
- Are Medical Prices Declining? Evidence from Heart Attack TreatmentsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998
- Accounting for future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysisJournal of Health Economics, 1997
- The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depressionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- A Historical Analysis of Medical Spending Growth, 1960–1993Health Affairs, 1995
- Medical Care Costs: How Much Welfare Loss?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1992
- The utility of different health states as perceived by the general publicJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1978