Which cervical sampler? A comparison of four methods
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cytopathology
- Vol. 5 (4), 219-225
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.1994.tb00423.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- ENDOCERVICAL BRUSH DEVICEThe Lancet, 1989
- Colposcopic assessment of the accuracy of cervical cytology screeningBMJ, 1988
- The Multispatula; a spatula adjustable to the shape of the individual cervixEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1987
- Controlled trial of a new cervical spatula.BMJ, 1987
- CERVICAL SMEARS: CHOICE OF SPATULA IS CRITICALThe Lancet, 1986
- THE MULTISPATULA: A NEW DIMENSION IN SAMPLING THE CERVIXThe Lancet, 1984
- TRIAL OF NEW CERVICAL SPATULAThe Lancet, 1976
- The Papanicolaou smear: An insensitive case-finding procedureAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1974
- Estimation of the screening error rate from the observed detection rates in repeated cervical cytologyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1974
- Influence of cell collection techniques upon cytological diagnosisCancer, 1965