Negative Impact of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 250 (1), 141-151
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181a77e59
Abstract
The Milan criteria have been adopted by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to preoperatively assess outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who receive orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). These criteria rely solely on radiographic appearances of the tumor, providing no measure of tumor biology. Recurrence rates, therefore, remain around 20% for patients within the criteria. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indicator of inflammatory status previously established as a prognostic indicator in colorectal liver metastases. We aimed to determine whether NLR predicts outcome in patients undergoing OLT for HCC. Analysis of patients undergoing OLT for HCC between 2001 and 2007 at our institution. A NLR ≥5 was considered to be elevated. A total of 150 patients were identified, with 13 patients having an elevated NLR. Of these, 62% developed recurrence compared with 14% with normal NLR (P < 0.0001). The disease-free survival for patients with high NLR was significantly worse than that for patients with normal NLR (1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals of 38%, 25%, and 25% vs. 92%, 85%, and 75%, P < 0.0001). Patients with high NLR also had poorer overall survival (5-year survival, 28% vs. 64%, P = 0.001). Patients within Milan with an elevated NLR had significantly poorer disease-free survival than those with normal NLR within Milan (5-year survival, 30% vs. 81%, P < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, 9 factors including an NLR ≥5 were significant predictors of poor disease-free survival. However, only a raised NLR remained significant on multivariate analysis (P = 0.005, HR: 19.98). Elevated NLR significantly increases the risk for tumor recurrence and recipient death. Preoperative NLR measurement may provide a simple method of identifying patients with poorer prognosis and act as an adjunct to Milan in determining, which patients benefit most from OLT.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Are the Milan criteria still valid?European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2008
- The evolution of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (past, present, and future)The Esophagus, 2008
- Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Expansion of the Tumor Size Limits Does Not Adversely Impact SurvivalHepatology, 2001
- Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular CarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 2001
- Liver transplantation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: The tumor-node-metastasis classification does not have prognostic powerHepatology, 1998
- Survival after liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative studyHepatology, 1997
- Liver Transplantation for the Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Patients with CirrhosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The 11 -year pittsburgh experience with liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: 1981-1991Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1993
- Hepatic Resection Versus Transplantation for Hepatocellular CarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Experience with liver resection and transplantation in 198 patientsWorld Journal of Surgery, 1991