The Relative Role of the Child–Pugh Classification and the Mayo Natural History Model in the Assessment of Survival in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Open Access
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology
- Vol. 29 (6), 1643-1648
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510290607
Abstract
The Child–Pugh classification is a simple, convenient prognostic measure in patients with liver cirrhosis. We investigated the relative role of the Child–Pugh classification and the Mayo model in the assessment of survival in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Of the 173 patients described in the original Mayo PSC natural history model, 147 patients had sufficient information in the medical record to allow computation of the Child–Pugh score. We used our most recent modification of the Mayo model to compute the risk score, based on patient's age, serum levels of bilirubin, albumin, and aspartate aminotransferase and history of variceal bleeding. Using the risk score (R), patients were divided into the low– (R < 0), intermediate– (0 ≤ R < 2), and high–risk (R ≥ 2) groups. Kaplan–Meier estimates and proportional hazards analysis were used to evaluate the two prognostic models. Although there was a statistically significant correlation between the Child–Pugh and Mayo risk scores, two–thirds of the patients had a Child–Pugh score of 5 or 6 and a relatively wide range of risk scores (-1.1–4.3). The probability of survival for 7 years in patients in the low–, intermediate–, and high–risk groups was 92%, 74%, and 40% for Child–Pugh class A (n = 96) and 100%, 62%, and 28% for Child–Pugh class B patients (n = 44), respectively. There were only a small number (n = 7) of Child–Pugh class C patients. In our age–adjusted multivariate analysis, each unit increase in the Mayo risk score was associated with a 2.5–fold increase in the risk of death (95% confidence interval: 1.8–3.4, P < .01), whereas Child–Pugh classification had no significant impact on survival (Child–Pugh B vs. A: risk ratio = 1.1 [95% confidence interval: 0.6–2.0]; Child–Pugh C versus A: risk ratio = 0.6 [95% confidence interval: 0.2–1.8]). In contrast to the Child–Pugh classification, which was developed for advanced liver cirrhosis, the Mayo model provides valid survival information, particularly in patients early in the course of PSC.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary Sclerosing CholangitisAnnals of Surgery, 1998
- The Child-Pugh classification as a prognostic indicator for survival in primary sclerosing cholangitisHepatology, 1997
- Ursodiol for Primary Sclerosing CholangitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Natural history and prognostic factors in 305 Swedish patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.Gut, 1996
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Liver transplantation or biliary surgerySurgery, 1995
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Refinement and validation of survival modelsGastroenterology, 1992
- Natural history and prognostic variables in primary sclerosing cholangitisGastroenterology, 1991
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Natural history, prognostic factors and survival analysisHepatology, 1989
- Primary Sclerosing CholangitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varicesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1973