Interpretation of Abdominal CT: Analysis of Errors and Their Causes
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
- Vol. 21 (5), 681-685
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199709000-00001
Abstract
Our goal was to analyze those factors contributing to the error rate in the interpretation of abdominal CT scans at an academic medical center. From a total of 694 consecutive patients (329 male, 365 female), we evaluated the error rates of interpreting abdominal CT studies. The average patient age was 54 years. All abdominal CT studies were reviewed by three to five CT faculty radiologists on the morning after the studies were performed. The error rate was correlated with reader variability, the number of cases read per day, the presence of a resident, inpatient versus outpatient, organ systems, etc. The χ2-test was used for statistical analysis. A total of 56 errors were found in the reports of 53 patients (overall error rate = 7.6%). Of these errors, 19 were judged to be clinically significant and 7 affected patient management. A statistically significant difference in error rates was noted among the five faculty radiologists (3.6-16.1%, p = 0.00062). No significant correlates between error rates and any of the other variables could be established. The primary determinant of error rates in body CT is the skill of the interpreting radiologist.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interobserver Variation in the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Mediastinal Lymph Node Size in Patients With Potentially Resectable Lung CancerChest, 1995
- Interobserver variability and accuracy of computed tomographic assessment of nodal status in lung cancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program.Radiology, 1994
- Observer variation in pattern type and extent of disease in fibrosing alveolitis on thin section computed tomography and chest radiographyClinical Radiology, 1994
- Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosisCancer, 1993
- Potential for Inter-Observer and Intra-Observer Variability in X-Ray Review to Establish Stone-Free Rates after LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1992
- Correlation of abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography scans with second- or third-look laparotomy in patients with ovarian carcinomaGynecologic Oncology, 1990
- Positive predictive value and examiner variability in diagnosing duodenal ulcerAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1985
- Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiologyAbdominal Radiology, 1980
- Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiologyAbdominal Radiology, 1980