Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism
Top Cited Papers
- 10 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 361 (24), 2342-2352
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0906598
Abstract
The direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has a predictable anticoagulant effect and may be an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients who have acute venous thromboembolism. In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving patients with acute venous thromboembolism who were initially given parenteral anticoagulation therapy for a median of 9 days (interquartile range, 8 to 11), we compared oral dabigatran, administered at a dose of 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin that was dose-adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. The primary outcome was the 6-month incidence of recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and related deaths. Safety end points included bleeding events, acute coronary syndromes, other adverse events, and results of liver-function tests. A total of 30 of the 1274 patients randomly assigned to receive dabigatran (2.4%), as compared with 27 of the 1265 patients randomly assigned to warfarin (2.1%), had recurrent venous thromboembolism; the difference in risk was 0.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.8 to 1.5; P<0.001 for the prespecified noninferiority margin). The hazard ratio with dabigatran was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.84). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 20 patients assigned to dabigatran (1.6%) and in 24 patients assigned to warfarin (1.9%) (hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.48), and episodes of any bleeding were observed in 205 patients assigned to dabigatran (16.1%) and 277 patients assigned to warfarin (21.9%; hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85). The numbers of deaths, acute coronary syndromes, and abnormal liver-function tests were similar in the two groups. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 9.0% of patients assigned to dabigatran and in 6.8% of patients assigned to warfarin (P=0.05). For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, a fixed dose of dabigatran is as effective as warfarin, has a safety profile that is similar to that of warfarin, and does not require laboratory monitoring. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00291330.)Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Warfarin for atrial fibrillation in community‐based practiseJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2008
- Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K AntagonistsChest, 2008
- Oral dabigatran etexilate vs. subcutaneous enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: the RE‐MODEL randomized trialJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2007
- The worcester venous thromboembolism studyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non‐surgical patientsJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2005
- The impact of long-term warfarin therapy on quality of life. Evidence from a randomized trial. Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation InvestigatorsArchives of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Heparin for 5 Days as Compared with 10 Days in the Initial Treatment of Proximal Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF WARFARIN STARTED EARLY AFTER SUBMASSIVE VENOUS THROMBOSIS OR PULMONARY EMBOLISMThe Lancet, 1986
- One‐Month versus Six‐Month Therapy with Oral Anticoagulants after Symptomatic Deep Vein ThrombosisActa Medica Scandinavica, 1985
- The Duration of Oral Anticoagulation after Deep Vein ThrombosisActa Medica Scandinavica, 1985