Evaluating and defining the sharpness of intraocular lenses
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 34 (2), 310-317
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.024
Abstract
To evaluate the microstructure of the edges of currently available square-edged hydrophobic intraocular lenses (IOLs) in terms of their deviation from an ideal square. Berlin Eye Research Institute, Berlin, Germany. Sixteen designs of hydrophobic acrylic or silicone IOLs were studied. For each design, a +20.0 diopter (D) IOL and a +0.0 D IOL (or the lowest available plus dioptric power) were evaluated. The IOL edge was imaged under high-magnification scanning electron microscopy using a standardized technique. The area above the lateral–posterior edge, representing the deviation from a perfect square, was measured in square microns using reference circles of 40 μm and 60 μm of radius and the AutoCAD LT 2000 system (Autodesk). The IOLs were compared with an experimental square-edged poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL (reference IOL) with an edge design that effectively stopped lens epithelial cell growth in culture in a preliminary study. Two round-edged silicone IOLs were used as controls. The hydrophobic IOLs used, labeled as square-edged IOLs, had an area of deviation from a perfect square ranging from 4.8 to 338.4 μm2 (40 μm radius reference circle) and from 0.2 to 524.4 μm2 (60 μm radius circle). The deviation area for the square-edged PMMA IOL was 34.0 μm2 with a 40 μm radius circle and 37.5 μm2 with a 60 μm radius circle. The respective values for the +20.0 D control silicone IOL were 729.3 μm2 and 1525.3 μm2 and for the +0.0 D control silicone IOL, 727.3 μm2 and 1512.7 μm2. Seven silicone IOLs of 5 designs had area values that were close to those of the reference square-edged PMMA IOL. Several differences in edge finishing between the IOLs analyzed were also observed. There was a large variation in the deviation area from a perfect square as well as in the edge finishing, not only between different IOL designs but also between different powers of the same design. Clinically, factors such as the shrink-wrapping of the IOL by the capsule may even out or modify the influence of these variations in terms of preventing posterior capsule opacification.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scanning electron microscopic analysis of acrylic intraocular lenses for microincision cataract surgeryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2006
- Evaluating and defining the sharpness of intraocular lensesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005
- In vivo digital imaging of the square-edged barrier effect of a silicone intraocular lensJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004
- Posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsificationJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2003
- Quantification of posterior capsule opacification with round and sharp edge intraocular lensesOphthalmology, 2003
- Effect of an acrylic intraocular lens with a sharp posterior optic edge on posterior capsule opacificationJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2002
- Comparison of the biocompatibility of 2 foldable intraocular lenses with sharp optic edgesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2001
- Photographic image analysis system of posterior capsule opacificationJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1997
- Scanning electron microscopic analysis of foldable acrylic and hydrogel intraocular lensesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1996
- An estimate of the human lens epithelial cell size in vivoExperimental Eye Research, 1987