Constructing a theory of the triple typology: Some (second) thoughts on nomothetic and idiographic approaches to personality
- 1 September 1983
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Personality
- Vol. 51 (3), 566-577
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00345.x
Abstract
Our fundamental scientific task is to convert observations of particular persons behaving in particular ways in particular situations into assertions that certain kinds of persons will behave in certain kinds of ways in certain kinds of situations, that is, to construct triple typologies or equivalence classes—of persons, of behaviors, and of situations—and to fashion theories of personality that relate these equivalence classes to one another. It is argued that the different approaches to the study of personality are distinguished from one another not by whether they are idiographic or nomothetic but by the strategies they employ for constructing—or ignoring—each of these three types of equivalence classes. The likely attributes of a successful interactional theory of personality—one that would embrace the entire triple typology—are proposed and discussed.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychological invasion of personalityJournal of Personality, 1983
- Self‐attention and self‐report: The “veridicality” hypothesisJournal of Personality, 1983
- Gender Schema Theory and Its Implications for Child Development: Raising Gender-Aschematic Children in a Gender-Schematic SocietySigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1983
- Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: A peer-rating study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing.Psychological Review, 1981
- Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people.Psychological Review, 1980
- Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations.Psychological Review, 1978
- On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior.Psychological Review, 1974
- Constructing cross-situational consistencies in behavior: Some thoughts on Alker's critique of MischelJournal of Personality, 1972
- The general and the unique in psychological science1Journal of Personality, 1962