Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 235 (6), 803-813
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200206000-00007
Abstract
To identify 10 critical elements of accurate and comprehensive reports of surgical complications. Despite a venerable tradition of weekly morbidity and mortality conferences, inconsistent complication reporting is common in the surgical literature. An analysis of articles reporting short-term outcomes after pancreatectomy, esophagectomy, and hepatectomy was performed. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from 1975 to 2001 and retrospective series of more than 100 patients published from 1990 to 2001 were reviewed. A total of 119 articles reporting outcomes in 22,530 patients were analyzed. This included 42 RCTs and 77 retrospective series. Of the 10 criteria developed, no articles met all criteria; 2% met 9 criteria, 38% 7 or 8, 34% 5 or 6, 40% 3 or 4, and 12% 1 or 2. Outpatient information (22% of articles), definitions of complications provided (34% of articles), severity grade used (20% of articles), and risk factors included in analysis (29% of articles) were the most commonly unmet quality reporting criteria. Type of study (RCT vs. retrospective), site of institution (U.S. vs. non-U.S.) and journal (U.S. vs. non-U.S.) did not influence the quality of complication reporting. Short-term surgical outcomes are routinely included in the data reported in the surgical literature. This is often used to show improvements over time or to assess the impact of therapeutic changes on patient outcome. The inconsistency of reporting and the lack of accepted principles of accrual, display, and analysis of complication data argue strongly for the creation and generalized use of standards for reporting this information.Keywords
This publication has 135 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extended Hepatic Resection: A 6-Year Retrospective Study of Risk Factors for Perioperative MortalityJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy in reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Liver resection using total vascular exclusion, scalpel division of the parenchyma, and a simple compression technique for hemostatis and biliary controlJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1999
- Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in octogenariansSurgery, 1999
- Stented Versus Nonstented Pancreaticojejunostomy After PancreatoduodenectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- A Prospective Randomized Trial of Extended Cervical and Superior Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma of the Thoracic EsophagusThe American Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: A controlled trialSurgery, 1996
- Factors affecting leakage following esophageal anastomosisSurgery Today, 1994
- Surgical Palliation for Pancreatic CancerAnnals of Surgery, 1990
- Decreased morbidity and mortality rates in surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990