Stereotactic radiosurgery alone versus resection plus whole‐brain radiotherapy for 1 or 2 brain metastases in recursive partitioning analysis class 1 and 2 patients
Open Access
- 4 June 2007
- Vol. 109 (12), 2515-2521
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22729
Abstract
BACKGROUND. The objective of this study was to compare stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone with resection plus whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for the treatment of patients in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class 1 and 2 who had 1 or 2 brain metastases. METHODS. Two hundred six patients in RPA class 1 and 2 who had 1 or 2 brain metastases were analyzed retrospectively. Patients in Group A (n = 94) received from 18 grays (Gy) to 25 Gy SRS, and patients in Group B (n = 112) underwent resection of their metastases and received 10 × 3 Gy/20 × 2 Gy WBRT. Eight other potential prognostic factors were evaluated regarding overall survival (OS), brain control (BC), and local control (LC) of treated metastases: age, sex, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, RPA class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases. RESULTS. A comparison of the 2 treatment groups did not reveal significantly different OS (P = .19), BC (P = .52), or LC (P = .25). In RPA subgroup analyses, outcome also did not differ significantly for either RPA class of patients (P values from .21 to .83). On multivariate analysis, improved OS was associated with age ≤60 years (relative risk [RR], 1.75; P = .002), better performance status (RR, 1.67; P = .015), no extracranial metastases (RR, 2.84; P < .001), interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment >12 months (RR, 1.70; P = .003), and RPA class 1 (RR, 1.51; P = .016). Improved BC was associated with a single metastasis (RR, 1.54; P = .034) and an interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment >12 months (RR, 1.58; P = .019), and improved LC was associated with an interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment >12 months (RR, 1.59; P = .047). CONCLUSIONS. SRS alone appeared to be as effective as resection plus WBRT in the treatment of 1 or 2 brain metastases for patients in RPA class 1 and 2. Patient outcomes were associated with age, Karnofsky performance status, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, RPA class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- RPA classification has prognostic significance for surgically resected single brain metastasisInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2006
- Radiosurgery for brain metastases: a score index for predicting prognosisInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2000
- Prognostic factors in brain metastases: should patients be selected for aggressive treatment according to recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes?International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2000
- Radiosurgery for brain metastases: is whole brain radiotherapy necessary?International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1999
- Radiosurgery for brain metastases: Relationship of dose and pattern of enhancement to local controlInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1997
- A multiinstitutional outcome and prognostic factor analysis of radiosurgery for resectable single brain metastasisInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1996
- Treatment of single brain metastasis: Radiotherapy alone or combined with neurosurgeryAnnals of Neurology, 1993
- A Randomized Trial of Surgery in the Treatment of Single Metastases to the BrainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Adjuvant radiation therapy after surgical resection of solitary brain metastasis: Association with pattern of failure and survivalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1987
- Intracerebral metastases in solid-tumor patients: Natural history and results of treatmentCancer, 1981