The Measurement Equivalence of Web-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Measures of Transformational Leadership
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organizational Research Methods
- Vol. 9 (3), 339-368
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106287434
Abstract
Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was applied to the responses of 4, 909 employees of a multinational organization with locations in 50 countries to examine the measurement equivalence of otherwise identical Web-based and paper-and-pencil versions of 20 items comprising the transformational leadership component of Bass and Avolio's Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. The results supported configural, metric, scalar, measurement error, and relational equivalence across administration modes, indicating that the psychometric properties of the 20 items were similar whether administered as a paper-and-pencil or Web-based measure. Although caution is always advised when considering multiple modes of administration, the results suggest that there are minimal measurement differences for well-developed, psychometrically sound instruments applied using either a paper-and-pencil or an online format. Thus, the results open a methodological door for survey researchers wishing to (a) assess transformational leadership with a Web-based platform and (b) compare or combine responses collected with paper-and-pencil and Web-based applications.Keywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implementing a Five-Factor Personality Inventory for Use on the InternetEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2005
- Measurement invariance in the General Health Questionnaire-12 in young Australian adolescentsEuropean Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2004
- Using pencil and paper, Internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: does methodology matter?Computers in Human Behavior, 2003
- Does computerizing paper-and-pencil job attitude scales make a difference? New IRT analyses offer insight.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000
- A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999
- Computer versus paper-and-pencil administration mode and response distortion in noncognitive selection tests.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997
- Responses on computer surveys: Impression management, social desirability, and the big brother syndromeComputers in Human Behavior, 1996
- Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992
- Evaluating microcomputer interactive survey softwareJournal of Business and Psychology, 1990
- Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989