Digital vascular imaging: practical aspects.
- 1 September 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 148 (3), 703-705
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878689
Abstract
Pairs (75) of digital subtraction angiogram images were evaluated for image quality for 4 independent observers. Each pair of images was derived from 2 separate injections in the same patient with only a single variable altered between injections, so that patients served as their own controls. The factors studied were contrast material I concentration, total volume of contrast material administered per injection, rate of contrast material injection, and catheter position. Observers consistently preferred images obtained following injection of the contrast agent with the higher concentration of I, following injection of the greater volume of contrast agent, and with the catheter placed in the superior vena cava rather than the basilic vein. No statistically significant differences in observer preference was found for the other categories studied.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: a comparative study in 100 patients.Radiology, 1981
- Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. Comparison with conventional aortography.Radiology, 1981
- Digital video subtraction angiography of renal vascular abnormalities.Radiology, 1981