Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 152 (9), 915-920
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.152.9.915
Abstract
Opinion from JAMA Pediatrics — Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews — III. How Did the Authors Synthesize the Data and Make Their Conclusions?Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- The case for failed meta‐analysesJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1995
- Clinically useful measures of effect in binary analyses of randomized trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Advantages and limitations of meta-analytic regressions of clinical trials dataControlled Clinical Trials, 1992
- An Approach for Assessing Publication Bias Prior to Performing a Meta-AnalysisStatistical Science, 1992
- Meta-analysis: State-of-the-ScienceEpidemiologic Reviews, 1992
- Meta‐analysis for 2 × 2 tables: A bayesian approachStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Can meta-analyses be trusted?The Lancet, 1991
- A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- Meta-Analysis in Clinical ResearchAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research.PsycCRITIQUESPsycCRITIQUESPsycCRITIQUESPsycCRITIQUES, 1985