Why Are Two Different Cross-linkers Necessary for Actin Bundle Formation In Vivo and What Does Each Cross-link Contribute?
Open Access
- 5 October 1998
- journal article
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in The Journal of cell biology
- Vol. 143 (1), 121-133
- https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.143.1.121
Abstract
In developing Drosophila bristles two species of cross-linker, the forked proteins and fascin, connect adjacent actin filaments into bundles. Bundles form in three phases: (a) tiny bundles appear; (b) these bundles aggregate into larger bundles; and (c) the filaments become maximally cross-linked by fascin. In mutants that completely lack forked, aggregation of the bundles does not occur so that the mature bundles consist of <50 filaments versus approximately 700 for wild type. If the forked concentration is genetically reduced to half the wild type, aggregation of the tiny bundles occurs but the filaments are poorly ordered albeit with small patches of fascin cross-linked filaments. In mutants containing an excess of forked, all the bundles tend to aggregate and the filaments are maximally crossbridged by fascin. Alternatively, if fascin is absent, phases 1 and 2 occur normally but the resultant bundles are twisted and the filaments within them are poorly ordered. By extracting fully elongated bristles with potassium iodide which removes fascin but leaves forked, the bundles change from being straight to twisted and the filaments within them become poorly ordered. From these observations we conclude that (a) forked is used early in development to aggregate the tiny bundles into larger bundles; and (b) forked facilitates fascin entry into the bundles to maximally cross-link the actin filaments into straight, compact, rigid bundles. Thus, forked aligns the filaments and then directs fascin binding so that inappropriate cross-linking does not occur.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Targeted disruption of the mouse villin gene does not impair the morphogenesis of microvilliDevelopmental Dynamics, 1998
- Actin Filament Cables in Drosophila Nurse Cells Are Composed of Modules That Slide Passively Past One Another during DumpingThe Journal of cell biology, 1997
- Drosophila singed, a fascin homolog, is required for actin bundle formation during oogenesis and bristle extension.The Journal of cell biology, 1994
- Three-dimensional structure of a single filament in the Limulus acrosomal bundle: scruin binds to homologous helix-loop-beta motifs in actinThe Journal of cell biology, 1994
- Preliminary biochemical characterization of the stereocilia and cuticular plate of hair cells of the chick cochlea.The Journal of cell biology, 1989
- Three-dimensional reconstruction of an actin bundle.The Journal of cell biology, 1988
- Assembly of the intestinal brush border: appearance and redistribution of microvillar core proteins in developing chick enterocytes.The Journal of cell biology, 1987
- Actin filaments, stereocilia, and hair cells of the bird cochleaDevelopmental Biology, 1986
- Actin filaments, stereocilia, and hair cells of the bird cochlea. II. Packing of actin filaments in the stereocilia and in the cuticular plate and what happens to the organization when the stereocilia are bent.The Journal of cell biology, 1983
- Structure of F-actin needles from extracts of sea urchin oocytesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1981