Evidence-based practice revisited
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Asia-Pacific journal of public health
- Vol. 13 (2), 116-121
- https://doi.org/10.1177/101053950101300210
Abstract
The evidence-based practice (EBP) movement has gathered considerable momentum both locally and abroad since first promoted a decade ago. This paper presents an updated narrative overview of EBP from the clinical and public health perspectives. First, the origins and definition of EBP and how clinicians should go about incorporating it into routine practice are described. Reasons for adopting the EBP philosophy are outlined and the way to learn the process described. The latter can be summarised as the five A's of EBP - assess, ask, acquire, appraise and apply. Limitations of the approach and misperceptions about its weaknesses are also discussed. Potential solutions are offered and areas for future work in the discipline of EBP are highlighted, with particular reference to Hong Kong's situation and that of elsewhere in Asia. Asia Pac JPublic Health 2001; 13(2): 116-121Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Opening the black box of clinical judgment an overviewBMJ, 1999
- Bringing Science To Medicine: The Origins Of Evidence-Based PracticeHealth Affairs, 1998
- Trends in Antihypertensive Drug Use in the United StatesJAMA, 1997
- "Is my practice evidence-based?"BMJ, 1996
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996
- The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effectBMJ, 1995
- Evidence-Based MedicineJAMA, 1992
- A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical ExpertsJAMA, 1992
- Physicians' Information Needs: Analysis of Questions Posed during Clinical TeachingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Information Needs in Office Practice: Are They Being Met?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1985