Synergistic Combinations of Anticonvulsant Agents: What Is the Evidence from Animal Experiments?
Open Access
- 5 March 2007
- Vol. 48 (3), 412-434
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00952.x
Abstract
Summary: Purpose: Combination therapy is often used in the treatment of seizures refractory to monotherapy. At the same time, the pharmacodynamic mechanisms that determine the combined efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are unknown, and this prevents a rational use of these drug combinations. We critically evaluate the existing evidence for pharmacodynamic synergism between AEDs from preclinical studies in animal models of epilepsy to identify useful combinations of mechanisms and to determine whether study outcome depends on the various research methods that are in use. Methods: Published articles were included if the studies were placebo‐controlled, in vivo, or ex vivo animal studies investigating marketed or experimental AEDs. The animal models that were used in these studies, the primary molecular targets of the tested drugs, and the methods of interpretation were recorded. The potential association of these factors with the study outcome (synergism: yes or no) was assessed through logistic regression analysis. Results: In total, 107 studies were identified, in which 536 interaction experiments were conducted. In 54% of these experiments, the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction was not investigated. The majority of studies were conducted in the maximal electroshock model, and other established models were the pentylenetetrazole model, amygdala kindling, and the DBA/2 model. By far the most widely used method for interpretation of the results was evaluation of the effect of a threshold dose of one agent on the median effective dose (ED50) of another agent. Experiments relying on this method found synergism significantly more often compared with experiments relying on other methods (p < 0.001). Furthermore, experiments including antagonists of the AMPA receptor were more likely to find synergism in comparison with all other experiments (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intensive preclinical research into the effects of AED combinations has not led to an understanding of the pharmacodynamic properties of AED combinations. Specifically, the majority of the preclinical studies are not adequately designed to distinguish between additive, synergistic, and antagonistic interactions. Quantitative pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic studies of selectively acting AEDs in a battery of animal models are necessary for the development of truly synergistic drug combinations.Keywords
This publication has 113 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards a mechanism-based analysis of pharmacodynamic drug?drug interactions in vivoPharmacology & Therapeutics, 2004
- Interaction of loreclezole with conventional antiepileptic drugs in amygdala-kindled ratsEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2004
- Lamotrigine and topiramate may be a useful combinationThe Lancet, 1998
- EFFICIENT DESIGNS FOR STUDYING SYNERGISTIC DRUG COMBINATIONSLife Sciences, 1997
- Influence of nicardipine, nimodipine and flunarizine on the anticonvulsant efficacy of antiepileptics against pentylenetetrazol in miceJournal of Neural Transmission, 1996
- The NMDA antagonist procyclidine, but not ifenprodil, enhances the protective efficacy of common antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in miceJournal of Neural Transmission, 1994
- Properties of the convulsive threshold determined by direct cortical stimulation in ratsEpilepsy Research, 1992
- Differential effects of agents enhancing purinergic transmission upon the antielectroshock efficacy of carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, diazepam, phenobarbital, and valproate in miceJournal of Neural Transmission, 1990
- Effect of GABA agonists on the neurotoxicity and anticonvulsant activity of benzodiazepinesLife Sciences, 1985
- Potentiation of the Antiepileptic Activity of Phenobarbital by NicotinamideEpilepsia, 1983