Survival and Implantation of Escherichia coli in the Intestinal Tract
- 1 February 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Infection and Immunity
- Vol. 39 (2), 686-703
- https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.39.2.686-703.1983
Abstract
A 0.5 ml inoculum introduced directly into the stomach of mice was cleared rapidly into the small intestine. Bicarbonate buffer, but not skim milk, protected such an inoculum from stomach acid until at least 90% of it had entered the small intestine. Passage and survival of various E. coli strains through the mouse gut were tested by introducing a buffered bacterial inoculum directly into the stomach with the following 2 intestinal tracers: Cr51Cl3 and spores of a thermophilic Bacillus sp. Quantitative recovery of excreted bacteria was accomplished by collecting the feces overnight in a refrigerated cage pan. Wild-type E. coli strains and E. coli K-12 were excreted rapidly (98-100% within 18 h) in the feces without overall multiplication or death. E. coli .chi. 1776 and DP50supF, i.e., strains certified for recombinant DNA experiments, underwent rapid death in vivo such that their excretion in the feces was reduced to .apprx. 1.1 and 4.7% of the inoculum, respectively. The acidity of the stomach had little bactericidal effect on the E. coli K-12 strain tested, but significantly reduced the survival of more acid-sensitive bacteria (Vibrio cholerae) under these conditions. Long-term implantation of E. coli strains into continuous-flow [CF] cultures of mouse cecal flora or into conventional mice was difficult. When the E. coli strain was first inoculated into sterile CF cultures or into germfree mice, which were subsequently associated with conventional mouse cecal flora, the E. coli strains persisted in a large proportion of the animals at levels resembling E. coli populations in conventional mice. Metabolic adaptation contributed only partially to the success of an E. coli inoculum that was first introduced. A mathematical model is described which explains this phenomenon on the basis of competition for adhesion sites, in which an advantage accrues to the bacterium which occupies those sites first. The mathematical model predicts that 2 bacterial strains that compete in the gut for the same limiting nutrient can coexist if the metabolically less efficient strains have specific adhesion sites available. The specific rate constant of E. coli growth in monoassociated gnotobiotic mice was 2.0 h-1; the excretion rate in conventional animals was -0.23 h-1. Consequently, limitation of growth must be the primary mechanism controlling bacterial populations in the large intestine. The beginnings of a general hypothesis of the ecology of the large intestine are proposed, in which the effects of the competitive metabolic interactions described earlier are modified by the effects of bacterial association with the intestinal wall.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- BEHAVIOR OF MIXED CULTURES OF MICROORGANISMSAnnual Review of Microbiology, 1977
- CHEMOTHERAPY AND ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE TRANSFER BETWEEN ENTEROBACTERIA IN THE HUMAN GASTRO-INTESTINAL TRACTJournal of Medical Microbiology, 1973
- In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluation of Liquid AntacidsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1973
- Colonization resistance of the digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated miceEpidemiology and Infection, 1971
- Effect of the Normal Microbial Flora on Gastrointestinal Motility.Experimental Biology and Medicine, 1967
- BACTERIAL INTERFERENCE IN EXPERIMENTAL BURNSThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1967
- RESISTANCE OF THE MOUSE'S INTESTINAL TRACT TO EXPERIMENTAL SALMONELLA INFECTIONThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1964
- Ecological Mechanism Controlling Growth of Escherichia Coli in Continuous Flow Cultures and in the Mouse IntestineThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1964
- Criteria for the Growth of Contaminants and Mutants in Continuous CultureJournal of General Microbiology, 1958
- The Continuous Culture of Bacteria; a Theoretical and Experimental StudyJournal of General Microbiology, 1956