Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: For Whom?
Top Cited Papers
- 10 November 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (32), 8165-8169
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.03.3134
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) –based prostate cancer screening results in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in many men who are not destined to have clinical progression during their lifetime. Good-risk prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score of 6 or less, PSA < 10, and T1c to T2a, now constitutes 50% of newly diagnosed prostate cancer. In most of these patients, the disease is indolent and slow growing. The challenge is to identify those patients who are unlikely to experience significant progression while offering radical therapy to those who are at risk. The approach to favorable-risk prostate cancer described in this article uses estimation of PSA doubling time (PSA DT) to stratify patients according to the risk of progression. Patients who select this approach are managed initially with active surveillance. Those who have a PSA DT of 3 years or less (based on a minimum of three determinations over 6 months) are offered radical intervention. The remainder are closely monitored with serial PSA and periodic prostate rebiopsies (at 2, 5, and 10 years). In this series of 299 patients, the median DT was 7 years. Forty-two percent had a PSA DT > 10 years, and 20% had a PSA DT > 100 years. The majority of patients on this study remain under surveillance. The approach of active surveillance with selective delayed intervention based on PSA DT represents a practical compromise between radical therapy for all (which results in overtreatment for patients with indolent disease) and watchful waiting with palliative therapy only (which results in undertreatment for those with aggressive disease).Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- 4-YEAR PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN PROGRESSION AND DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE EUROPEAN RANDOMIZED STUDY OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER, SECTION ROTTERDAMJournal of Urology, 2005
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- 20-Year Outcomes Following Conservative Management of Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 2005
- THE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ERA IN THE UNITED STATES IS OVER FOR PROSTATE CANCER: WHAT HAPPENED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS?Journal of Urology, 2004
- Prevalence of Prostate Cancer among Men with a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per MilliliterNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Time Trends and Characteristics of Men Choosing Watchful Waiting for Initial Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From CaPSUREJournal of Urology, 2003
- Correlation Between Glomerular Size and Long-Term Renal Function in Patients with Substantial Loss of Renal MassJournal of Urology, 2003
- Natural History of Progression After PSA Elevation Following Radical ProstatectomyJAMA, 1999
- Carcinoma of the Prostate: A 15-Year FollowupJournal of Urology, 1972
- Twenty Single Nodules of Prostate Cancer Not Treated by Total ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1968