Evaluation of the nutritional and inflammatory status in cancer patients for the risk assessment of severe haematological toxicity following chemotherapy
Open Access
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 14 (1), 36-41
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdg013
Abstract
Background: The toxicity outcome of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy is difficult to predict. In this study the influence of malnutrition and inflammation on acute haematological toxicity was investigated. Patients and methods: Between January 1999 and January 2000, 48 consecutive cancer patients experienced severe haematological toxicity (SHT), either neutropenic fever or severe thrombocytopenia, following various chemotherapy regimens. Their baseline characteristics were compared with those of 59 control patients. Previous chemotherapy regimens, type of chemotherapy, performance status (PS), calculated creatinine clearance, bilirubin, C-reactive protein (1), alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (2), albumin (3), pre-albumin (4) and the nutritional and inflammatory status (NIS) ratio [NIS = (1 × 2)/(3 × 4)] were studied. Statistical analysis was carried out using either a t-test or a chi-square test. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined the cut-off value for NIS. Results: Patients experiencing SHT had a higher PS (P P P P P P P Conclusions: Altered nutritional and inflammatory status correlates with increased risk of severe haematological toxicity following anticancer chemotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Body-Size Measures on Irinotecan Clearance: Alternative Dosing RecommendationsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Validation of a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Strategy for Thiotepa in a High-Dose Chemotherapy RegimenTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2001
- Prediction of outcome in critically ill patients using artificial neural network synthesised by genetic algorithmThe Lancet, 1996
- Progressive cellular dehydration and proteolysis in critically ill patientsThe Lancet, 1996
- Perioperative Nutritional Support in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Metabolic response to sepsis and traumaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1989
- USE OF APACHE II SEVERITY OF DISEASE CLASSIFICATION TO IDENTIFY INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT PATIENTS WHO WOULD NOT BENEFIT FROM TOTAL PARENTERAL NUTRITIONThe Lancet, 1986
- Comparison of nutritional indices and outcome in critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1982
- Total Parenteral Nutrition in the Cancer PatientNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Nutritional Care of the Cancer PatientJAMA, 1980