Effects of scheduling and ascites-associated macrophages on combined antiproliferative activity of alpha-2b interferon and gamma-interferon in a clonogenic assay
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
- Vol. 22 (3), 215-222
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00273414
Abstract
Effects of combination treatment with human recombinant alpha-2b interferon (IFN-α2b) and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and sequencing of the combination on colony formation of human tumor cells were studied in a human tumor clonogenic assay (HTCA) with or without ascites-associated macrophages (AAM). Five different human tumor cell lines were studied. Three of the five cell lines (ovarian cancer cell line BG-1, cervical cancer cell line ME-180, and melanoma cell line SK-MEL 28) were sensitive to both IFNs.Cervical cancer cell line CaSki was sensitive to IFN-α2b but resistant to IFN-γ. Endometrial cancer cell line HEC-1A was resistant to both IFNs. Synergistic interaction was observed in BG-1 and SK-MEL 28 with a combination of the IFNs. ME-180 did not exhibit a positive interaction, in spite of its sensitivity to each IFN. CaSki and HEC-1A also did not exhibit a positive combined interaction at clinically achievable concentrations. One sequential combination method (method 1: IFN-α2b → IFN gamma with a 24-h interval) resulted in a similar antitumor effect as the simultaneous combination. A reversed sequential method (method 2: IFN-γ → IFN-α2b with a 24-h interval) was less effective in three of the five cell lines. In BG-1, AAM enclosed in the lower layer markedly enhanced the antitumor effect of combined IFNs as well as each IFN alone. The antitumor effect with method 1 was significantly greater than that achieved with simultaneous combination or combination according to method 2 in the presence of AAM (P<0.01). These results suggest that (1) a synergistic antitumor effect of IFN-α2b and IFN gamma is demonstrable in selected types of tumors, depending upon the sensitivity of each tumor cell line to both IFNs; (2) optimal scheduling for the direct antitumor effect of combined IFNs seems to be long-term exposure of cells to the IFN, the cells being treated with both IFNs either simultaneously or sequentially (IFN-α2b preceding IFN-γ); and (3) AAM potentiate the antitumor effect of IFNs either alone or in combination. Finally, IFN-α2b may have some priming effects for the indirect effect of IFN gamma mediated through AAM in certain tumor cells.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combined recombinant human interferon alpha2 and cytotoxic agents studied in a clonogenic assayInternational Journal of Cancer, 1985
- Cytolytic activity of interferon‐gamma and its synergism with 5‐fluorouracilInternational Journal of Cancer, 1984
- Alpha Interferon for Induction of Remission in Hairy-Cell LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Evidence that types I and II interferons have different receptorsNature, 1981
- Purified human immune interferon has more potent anticellular activity than fibroblast or leukocyte interferonCellular Immunology, 1980
- Immune Interferon Activates Cells More Slowly Than Does Virus-Induced InterferonExperimental Biology and Medicine, 1978
- Primary Bioassay of Human Tumor Stem CellsScience, 1977
- Tumor Antigen and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin in CaSki Cells: A New Epidermoid Cervical Cancer Cell LineScience, 1977
- Cell surface antigens of human malignant melanoma: mixed hemadsorption assays for humoral immunity to cultured autologous melanoma cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1976
- Virus interference. I. The interferonProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1957