Protection of Research Subjects: Do Special Rules Apply in Epidemiology?
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Law, Medicine and Health Care
- Vol. 19 (3-4), 184-190
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1991.tb01813.x
Abstract
... Before we dismiss ethics as nothing more than a cause of confusion and needless worry, I think we need to take a careful look at epidemiologists' ethical obligations to research subjects. In doing so, we should pay particular attention to three points: first, the difference between harming someone and wronging them; second, the role of informed consent in protecting against such wrongs; and third, the steps that can be taken to avoid or minimize particular harms associated with breaches of privacy and confidentiality.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Application of Recombinant DNA Technology for Genetic Probing in EpidemiologyAnnual Review of Public Health, 1989
- When the Subjects Are Hospital Staff, Is It Ethical (Or Possible) to Get Informed Consent?IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 1987
- Protecting Confidentiality in Epidemiologic Investigations by the Centers for Disease ControlNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- IRBs and Epidemiologic Research: How Inappropriate Restrictions Hamper StudiesIRB: Ethics & Human Research, 1984
- The Rise and Fall of Epidemiology, 1950–2000 A.D.New England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Who Studies Whom?Human Organization, 1974
- PrivacyThe Yale Law Journal, 1968