Concentric versus eccentric isokinetic strengthening of the rotator cuff
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 16 (1), 64-69
- https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658801600112
Abstract
Twenty-two male and female college varsity tennis players trained for 6 weeks, one group using eccentric isokinetic internal and external shoulder rotation, and the second group using concentric isokinetic internal and external shoulder rotation. Subjects pretested and posttested both concentrically and eccentrically, so that training overflow and specificity could be examined. Three maximally hit tennis serves made before and after training, which were analyzed by high speed cin ematography to obtain ball velocity, served as a func tional performance measurement. Statistical analysis of peak torque (newton meters) and peak torque to body weight ratio have revealed significant concentric strength gains (P < 0.005) in the concentric as well as the eccentric training groups. Eccentric strength gains were demonstrated by the concentric training group at selected speeds (P < 0.05 and P < 0.005) but were not generated in the eccentric group at the P < 0.05 significance level. Functional test analysis shows an increase in maximal serve velocity at a significance level of P < 0.005 in the concentric training group, with no significant (P > 0.01) increases in the eccentric group.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention and Treatment of Throwing-Arm InjuriesThe Physician and Sportsmedicine, 1985
- Effect of Eccentric and Concentric Muscle Conditioning on Tension and Electrical Activity of Human Muscle*Ergonomics, 1972
- Eccentric vs concentric muscle training for strength developmentMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1972
- Influence of Muscle Tension Variations and Energy Absorption on Oxygen Consumption, Heart Rate, and Cardiac Output during Negative WorkScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1971
- A comparison of concentric, eccentric, and isometric strength of elbow flexorsJournal of Applied Physiology, 1965