Computer-Based Drug-Utilization Review — Risk, Benefit, or Boondoggle?
- 15 June 1995
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 332 (24), 1641-1645
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199506153322411
Abstract
On October 28, 1990, with little debate, Congress passed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, requiring the states to provide claims-based drug-utilization review to approximately 34 million Medicaid enrollees.1,2 The provisions of the program were borrowed from the ill-fated Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988, repealed in 1990; the stated goals were to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing and dispensing of medications, enhance the counseling of patients, and reduce growth in expenditures for drugs.1 Drug-utilization review is a structured, ongoing program that interprets patterns of drug use in relation to predetermined criteria and attempts to prevent or minimize inappropriate prescribing.3, . . .Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Journal's Policy on Cost-Effectiveness AnalysesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Effects of Limiting Medicaid Drug-Reimbursement Benefits on the Use of Psychotropic Agents and Acute Mental Health Services by Patients with SchizophreniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Experience of State Drug Benefit ProgramsHealth Affairs, 1990
- Reins or Fences: A Physician's View of Cost ContainmentHealth Affairs, 1990
- Pharmacokinetic Interactions with DigoxinClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1988
- Payment Restrictions for Prescription Drugs under MedicaidNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Psychotropic Drug Use and the Risk of Hip FractureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Allocation of Resources to Manage HypertensionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977