Bile Duct Injuries, 1989-1993
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 131 (4), 382-388
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430160040007
Abstract
Objective: To review the incidence of major bile duct injuries (MBDI) during the shift from open (OC) to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Design: Cohort analysis; minimum 15-month patient follow-up. Setting: Acute care Connecticut hospitals. Patients: Medical records of 30211 patients with cholecystectomy (OC or LC) reviewed; 47 cases of MBDI confirmed. Main Outcome Measure: Rate of MBDI. Results: The incidence of MBDI in Connecticut hospitals rose from 0.04% in 1989 to 0.24% in 1991, then decreased to 0.11% in 1993. The increase was due to increased numbers of cholecystectomies and the initial increased risk of injury with LC. The 1990-through-1993 trend of decreasing incidence of LC MBDI was statistically significant (P=.02). By 1993, the difference between LC and OC was no longer significant (P=.81). Acute cholecystitis (odds ratio, 3.3) and gallstone pancreatitis (odds ratio, 3.6) increased the risk of MBDI during LC (P<.001). The LC MBDI more commonly were ductal excision or transections and often were not diagnosed intraoperatively. Intraoperative cholangiography facilitated intraoperative recognition and repair. Most patients (89%) underwent definitive management of the MBDI at the hospital of origin; of those, 5% required further interventions. Conclusions: Surgeries for acute cholecystitis and gallstone pancreatitis are associated with an increased risk for MBDI. Ductal anatomy, the timing of recognition of injury, and the method of repair dictate patient outcomes. Most patients are successfully managed at the hospital of origin, with good long-term results. Late bile duct strictures appear rare. (Arch Surg. 1996;131:382-388)Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Multivariate Comparison of Complications After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Open CholecystectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Diffusion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Among General Surgeons in the United StatesMedical Care, 1995
- Surgical Rates and Operative Mortality for Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in MarylandNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Open Cholecystectomy A Contemporary Analysis of 42,474 PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- U.S. Experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The European experienceThe American Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiographyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1993
- NIH Consensus conference. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- A Prospective Analysis of 1518 Laparoscopic CholecystectomiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991