Current Knowledge and Future Prospects for the Use of HIV Protease Inhibitors
- 1 May 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Drugs
- Vol. 51 (5), 701-712
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199651050-00001
Abstract
The HIV protease (or proteinase) enzyme is an essential component of the replicative cycle of HIV, performing the post-transitional processing of the gag and gag-pol gene products into the functional core proteins and viral enzymes. Inhibition of this enzyme leads to production of immature noninfectious viral progeny, and hence prevention of further rounds of infection. Structurally, the enzyme is a homodimer consisting of two identical 99 amino acid chains. HIV protease is a member of the aspartic protease family but is structurally dissimilar to human aspartic proteases such as renin, gastricsin and cathepsin D and E, suggesting the possibility of creating inhibitors with a wide therapeutic index. At least 6 inhibitors of HIV protease are currently in clinical development: saquinavir, indinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir (AG-1343), KNI-272 and VX-478, the first four of which have shown antiretroviral activity and acceptable tolerability in initial phase I/II clinical trials. Resistance or reduced sensitivity to the leading protease inhibitors has been reported in vivo and appears to be associated with loss of therapeutic effect. However, resistance patterns appear to be distinct. Treatment for 1 year with indinavir has been reported to lead to selection of virus in 4 patients, which was cross-resistant to all other leading protease inhibitors. On the other hand, a larger series of clinical isolates from patients receiving saquinavir alone or in combination with zidovudine for up to 3 years did not lead to virus cross-resistant to either indinavir or ritonavir. This suggests that care should be exercised in designing the sequence of protease usage. Additionally, differing resistance patterns may be used to select combinations of protease inhibitors in future trials. Data from studies combining protease inhibitors with nucleoside analogues suggest value in terms of larger and more prolonged virological and immunological marker responses than are observed with single agent therapy, and this is likely to be the primary role for protease inhibitors; both in initial combinations for patients commencing therapy and as add-in therapies for patients previously treated with antiretrovirais. However, in vitro and animal pharmacokinetic studies also give evidence of the possibility of combining protease inhibitors, potentially leading to improved bioavailability, antiviral synergy and delay in emergence of viral resistance.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduced sensitivity to saquinavir: an update on genotyping from phase I/II trialsAntiviral Research, 1996
- In vivo emergence of HIV-1 variants resistant to multiple protease inhibitorsNature, 1995
- Reduction Of The In Vitro Activity Of A77003, An Inhibitor Of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease, By Human Serum 1 Acid GlycoproteinThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1995
- Update on a proteinase inhibitorAIDS, 1994
- Correlates of zidovudine phosphorylation with markers of HIV disease progression and drug toxicityAIDS, 1994
- Differential phosphorylation of azidothymidine, dideoxycytidine, and dideoxyinosine in resting and activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1993
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Inhibitory Interactions between Protease Inhibitor Ro 31-8959 and Zidovudine, 2',3'-Dideoxycytidine, or Recombinant Interferon- A against Zidovudine-Sensitive or -Resistant HIV-1 In VitroThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Rational Design of Peptide-Based HIV Proteinase InhibitorsScience, 1990
- ZidovudineDrugs, 1989
- The Efficacy of Azidothymidine (AZT) in the Treatment of Patients with AIDS and AIDS-Related ComplexNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987