Gadolinium-based contrast media compared with iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in azotaemic patients
- 27 July 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Vol. 19 (10), 2526-2531
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh272
Abstract
Background. Stenosis is the main cause of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure. It is unclear, however, if surveillance for stenosis enhances AVF function and longevity and if there is an ideal time for intervention.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Gadolinium-based Contrast Media Really Safer than Iodinated Media for Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patients with Azotemia?Radiology, 2002
- Gadodiamide as an Alternative Contrast Agent in Intravenous Digital Subtraction Angiography and Interventional Procedures of the Upper Extremity VeinsCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2002
- The Use of Gadolinium Chelates for X-Ray Digital Subtraction AngiographyInvestigative Radiology, 2001
- Renal Tolerance of a Neutral Gadolinium Chelate (gadobutrol) in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure: Results of a Randomized StudyRadiology, 2001
- Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents as an Alternative at Vena Cavography in Patients with Renal Insufficiency—Early ExperienceRadiology, 1999
- Use of gadopentetate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty and stent placementKidney International, 1998
- The Effect of Acute Renal Failure on MortalityJAMA, 1996
- Nephrotoxicity of high‐dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrastJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1996
- Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: A randomized trialKidney International, 1995
- Renal Tolerance of Gadolinium-DOTA and Gadolinium-DTPA in RatsInvestigative Radiology, 1994