Application of a customised birthweight standard in the assessment of perinatal outcome in a high risk population
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 105 (5), 531-535
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10154.x
Abstract
Objective Physiological as well as pathological variables influence birthweight. The aim of the present study was to examine perinatal outcome in relation to birthweight centiles applying a customised birthweight standard. Methods Two hundred and seventeen babies from high risk pregnancies were evaluated and classified as small or not small for gestational age according to two standards: 1. conventional Dutch birthweight centiles and 2. customised centiles which adjust individually for physiological variables like maternal booking weight, height and ethnic origin. Results Customisation of the weight standards resulted in identification of an additional group of infants who were small for gestational age, but not by the Dutch standards. These babies were associated with significantly more adverse perinatal events than those who were not small for gestational age as defined by a customised standard. Conclusions Adjustment of birthweight centiles for physiological variables significantly improves the identification of infants who have failed to reach the expected birthweight and who are at increased risk for adverse perinatal events.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standardsObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- An adjustable fetal weight standardUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical arteryThe Lancet, 1994
- Maternal characteristics and expected birth weightEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1993
- The individualised birthweight ratio: a more logical outcome measure of pregnancy than birthweight aloneBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Customised antenatal growth chartsThe Lancet, 1992
- Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational ageBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Neonatal morphometrics and perinatal outcome: Who is growth retarded?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Intrauterine Growth Retardation: Clinical and ExperimentalActa Paediatrica, 1985
- On Intrauterine GrowthInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1970