Adrenal suppression with chronic dosing of fluticasone propionate compared with budesonide in adult asthmatic patients
Open Access
- 1 January 1997
- Vol. 52 (1), 55-58
- https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.52.1.55
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a previous single dosing comparison between fluticasone propionate and budesonide differences in cortisol levels measured at 08.00 hours were observed at doses in excess of 1000 micrograms. The aim of this study was to compare the adrenal suppression caused by chronic twice daily dosing with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (B) given on a microgram equivalent basis by metered dose inhaler to asthmatic patients. METHODS: Twelve stable asthmatic patients of mean age 29.7 years with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 89.0% predicted and mid forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75) 58.9% predicted, on 400 micrograms/day or less of inhaled corticosteroid, were studied in a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover design comparing inhaled budesonide and fluticasone propionate in doses of 250 micrograms, 500 micrograms, and 1000 micrograms twice daily. Each dose was given at 08.00 hours and 22.00 hours for four days by metered dose inhaler with mouth rinsing. Measurements were made of overnight urinary cortisol excretion and plasma cortisol levels at 08.00 hours, 10 hours after the eighth dose. RESULTS: The plasma cortisol levels (nmol/ l) at 08.00 hours showed that fluticasone propionate produced lower cortisol levels than budesonide at all three dose levels: F500 333.8, B500 415.2 (95% CI 28.9 to 134.0); F1000 308.3, B1000 380.3 (95% CI 10.5 to 133.5); F2000 207.3, B2000 318.5 (95% CI 5.8 to 216.7); placebo 399.9. Fluticasone produced greater effects than budesonide on the overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine ratio (nmol/mmol) at all three dose levels: F500 3.12, B500 5.55 (95% CI 0.16 to 3.79); F1000 2.54, B1000 6.12 (95% CI 1.25 to 5.91); F2000 2.07, B2000 6.09 (95% CI 0.88 to 7.18); placebo 5.23. CONCLUSIONS: With repeated dosing across a dose range of 250-1000 micrograms twice daily, fluticasone propionate produced significantly greater adrenal suppression than budesonide for both plasma and urinary cortisol. It was therefore possible to demonstrate differences between fluticasone and budesonide at lower doses with chronic dosing from those previously found with single dosing when given on a microgram equivalent basis in asthmatic patients. Factors contributing to the systemic adverse activity profile of fluticasone comprise enhanced receptor potency, prolonged receptor residency time, greater tissue retention, and a longer elimination half life.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of the relative systemic potency of inhaled fluticasone and budesonideEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1996
- An assessment of the systemic effects of single and repeated doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate and inhaled budesonide in healthy volunteersEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1996
- Comparative adrenal suppression with inhaled budesonide and fluticasone propionate in adult asthmatic patients.Thorax, 1996
- Measuring the systemic effects of inhaled beclomethasone: timed morning urine collections compared with 24 hour specimens.Thorax, 1995
- Aerosol Particle Generation from Dry Powder Inhalers: Can They Equal Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers?Journal of Aerosol Medicine, 1995
- An assessment of the systemic activity of single doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate in healthy volunteers [see comments]British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1994
- High-dose inhaled steroids in asthmatics: moderate efficacy gain and suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Research Council of the Norwegian Thoracic SocietyEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1994
- Binding kinetics of fluticasone propionate to the human glucocorticoid receptorSteroids, 1994
- Lung deposition of budesonide from Turbuhaler is twice that from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler P-MDIEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1994
- Guidelines for the management of asthma: a summary. British Thoracic Society and others.BMJ, 1993