Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures
- 6 December 1997
- Vol. 315 (7121), 1533-1537
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1533
Abstract
Meta-analysis is a statistical procedure that integrates the results of several independent studies considered to be “combinable.”1 Well conducted meta-analyses allow a more objective appraisal of the evidence than traditional narrative reviews, provide a more precise estimate of a treatment effect, and may explain heterogeneity between the results of individual studies.2 Ill conducted meta-analyses, on the other hand, may be biased owing to exclusion of relevant studies or inclusion of inadequate studies.3 Misleading analyses can generally be avoided if a few basic principles are observed. In this article we discuss these principles, along with the practical steps in performing meta-analysis.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-analysis: Potentials and promiseBMJ, 1997
- How to read a paper: The Medline databaseBMJ, 1997
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- The number needed to treat: a clinically useful nomogram in its proper contextBMJ, 1996
- Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviewsThe Lancet, 1996
- Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articlesBMJ, 1994
- Meta-Analysis by the Confidence Profile Method: The Statistical Synthesis of EvidenceTechnometrics, 1993
- Problems induced by meta‐analysesStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985