Methods for comparing cumulative hazard functions in a semi-proportional hazard model
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 11 (11), 1465-1476
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780111105
Abstract
Graphical methods based on the analysis of differences between log cumulative hazard functions are considered for a two‐group semi‐proportional hazard model which allows for interaction between treatments and covariates. Confidence procedures and test statistics that can be used to test for interaction and for main effects are developed. Their use is illustrated by applying them to the analysis of kidney transplant data from the University of California, San Francisco.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Martingale-based residuals for survival modelsBiometrika, 1990
- Ex-Smokers and the Multistage Model for Lung CancerEpidemiology, 1990
- Graphical comparison of cumulative hazards for two populationsBiometrika, 1989
- Assessment of stratum‐covariate interactions in Cox's proportional hazards regression modelStatistics in Medicine, 1986
- Cox's Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample StudyThe Annals of Statistics, 1982
- A Large Sample Study of Cox's Regression ModelThe Annals of Statistics, 1981
- DO BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS ENHANCE THE POSSIBILITY OF A COMPATIBLE TRANSPLANT?Transplantation, 1979
- Proportional Hazard Regression Models and the Analysis of Censored Survival DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1977
- Partial likelihoodBiometrika, 1975
- Practical Steps towards the Prevention of Bronchial CarcinomaScottish Medical Journal, 1970