Spread of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: Why Did It Happen in the United States?
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 19 (8), 539-545
- https://doi.org/10.2307/30141777
Abstract
The question of why vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) became epidemic in the United States can be answered on at least three basic levels: (1) molecular and genetic, (2) factors affecting host-microbe interactions, and (3) epidemiological. This article will address the epidemiological issues and seek to defend the assertion that, once VRE had evolved, its spread throughout hospitals in the United States was all but assured. Nosocomial VRE outbreaks were reported first in the mid- and late-1980s. Since that time, scientific reports of VRE have increased over 20-fold. Among hospitals participating in the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System from 1989 to 1997, the percentage of enterococci reported as resistant to vancomycin increased from 0.4% to 23.2% in intensive-care settings and from 0.3% to 15.4% in non-intensive-care settings. Factors leading to the spread of VRE in US hospitals include (1) antimicrobial pressure, (2) sub-optimal clinical laboratory recognition and reporting, (3) unrecognized "silent" carriage and prolonged fecal carriage, (4) environmental contamination and survival, (5) intrahospital and interhospital transfer of colonized patients, (6) introduction of unrecognized carriers from community settings such as nursing homes, and (7) inadequate compliance with hand washing and barrier precautions. Guidelines developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee address each of these factors. The impact of these guidelines on the spread of VRE within individual institutions has been variable, and the overall impact of the guidelines nationally is unknown.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Semiquantitative Analysis of the Fecal Flora of Patients with Vancomycin‐Resistant Enterococci: Colonized Patients Pose as Infection Control RiskClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Infection ControlInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1997
- Recurrent Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia in a Leukemia Patient Who Was Persistently Colonized with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci for Two YearsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Vancomycin-resistant Gram-positive cocci: risk factors for faecal carriageJournal of Hospital Infection, 1997
- Strategies to Prevent and Control the Emergence and Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Microorganisms in Hospitals. A challenge to hospital leadershipPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Compliance with handwashing and barrier precautionsJournal of Hospital Infection, 1995
- Handwashing—the Semmelweis lesson forgotten?The Lancet, 1994
- Colonization pattern of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faeciumAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1994
- Plasmid-Mediated Resistance to Vancomycin and Teicoplanin in Enterococcus FaeciumNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Susceptibility of Group D Streptococcus (Enterococcus) to 21 Antibiotics In Vitro, with Special Reference to Species DifferencesThe American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1969