Cobalt plaque versus enucleation for uveal melanoma: comparison of survival rates.
- 1 July 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 72 (7), 494-497
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.72.7.494
Abstract
Two hundred and twenty-three patients treated by cobalt plaque for uveal melanoma were compared with 416 patients treated by enucleation for uveal melanoma in terms of patient survival. The median follow-up time for the patients treated by cobalt plaque was 4.3 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated up to five years following treatment based on time to tumor-related deaths. Cox''s proportional hazards multivariate analysis was performed to determine which variables were related to melanoma-related deaths while controlling for age, size, and location of the tumors. Statistically significant predictive factors were location of tumor and largest tumor dimension. There was not a statistically significant difference in survival between patients treated by cobalt plaque and those treated by enucleation.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Prognosis After Enucleation vs Cobalt 60 Irradiation of MelanomasArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1985
- A Prognostic Factor Study of Disease-Free Interval and Survival Following Enucleation for Uveal MelanomaArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1983
- Local radiotherapy in the treatment of malignant melanoma of the choroid.1977
- Prognostic Factors in Choroidal and Ciliary Body MelanomasArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1977
- Prognostic Factors in Small Malignant Melanomas of Choroid and Ciliary BodyArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1977
- Radiotherapy for malignant melanoma of the choroid.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1966
- The size and shape of malignant melanomas of the choroid and ciliary body in relation to prognosis and histologic characteristics; a statistical study of 210 tumors.1955