THREE STEPS OF HOMOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Cladistics
- Vol. 12 (3), 265-272
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00014.x
Abstract
- In 1991 de Pinna (Cladistics 7: 367-394) coined the term primary homology as the putative homology statements prior to tree reconstruction. However, some confusion still exists regarding the conjectural nature of homology and to the analysis of DNA sequences. By dividing de Pinna's term primary homology into topographical identity and character state identity, we emphasize the sequential refinement of putative homology statements. We discuss the problem of transformational versus taxic homology and explain the application of our terms to DNA sequence data.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- MOVING TARGETS AND SHELL GAMESCladistics, 1994
- PARSIMONY, HOMOLOGY AND THE ANALYSIS OF MULTISTATE CHARACTERSCladistics, 1992
- CONCEPTS AND TESTS OF HOMOLOGY IN THE CLADISTIC PARADIGMCladistics, 1991
- ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF SYSTEMATICSCladistics, 1985
- Outgroups and ParsimonySystematic Zoology, 1982
- Similar Amino Acid Sequences: Chance or Common Ancestry?Science, 1981
- Philosophy and the Transformation of CladisticsSystematic Zoology, 1979
- Cladograms, Phylogenetic Trees, and Hypothesis TestingSystematic Zoology, 1977
- Philosophical Foundations of Classical Evolutionary ClassificationSystematic Zoology, 1973
- The Observational Basis of HomologySystematic Zoology, 1966