Improving the Reliability of Retrospective Survey Measures
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 5 (2), 207-229
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8100500204
Abstract
Data from a panel study of the impact of a low-income cooperative on its members are employed to compare the relative advantages of three different methods of measuring change. Although analysis confirmed the often reported unreliability of retrospective compared to true panel measurements, it also showed that "pseudo panel" retrospective approximations of panel measurements are greatly superior to change assessments made by respondents themselves. Finally, the three different types of change measures are compared in actual estimations of the impact of project participation on members. Results of this comparison confirm that, although true longitudinal designs arepreferable, pseudo panel measures of change may sometimes be acceptable and should definitely be preferred to the third, more subjective assessments of change.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Causal Approach to Measurement Error in Panel Analysis: Some Further ContingenciesPublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- A Statistical Analysis of the O E O Experiment in Educational Performance ContractingThe Journal of Human Resources, 1973
- Causal Inference from Panel DataSociological Methodology, 1970
- Some linear models for two-wave, two-variable panel analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1969
- Path Analysis: Sociological ExamplesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1966
- The effects of plausibility on the learning of controversial statements.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958
- Validity of Responses to Survey QuestionsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1950
- The learning and forgetting of controversial material.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1943
- The Questionnaire in a Sociological Research ProjectAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1933
- Stability in Questionnaire ResponseAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1931