Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict the Own-Race Advantage in Recognition Memory
Open Access
- 10 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (4), e58253
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058253
Abstract
Individuals are consistently better at recognizing own-race faces compared to other-race faces (other-race effect, ORE). One popular hypothesis is that this recognition memory ORE is caused by differential own- and other-race holistic processing, the simultaneous integration of part and configural face information into a coherent whole. Holistic processing may create a more rich, detailed memory representation of own-race faces compared to other-race faces. Despite several studies showing that own-race faces are processed more holistically than other-race faces, studies have yet to link the holistic processing ORE and the recognition memory ORE. In the current study, we sought to use a more valid method of analyzing individual differences in holistic processing by using regression to statistically remove the influence of the control condition (part trials in the part-whole task) from the condition of interest (whole trials in the part-whole task). We also employed regression to separately examine the two components of the ORE: own-race advantage (regressing other-race from own-race performance) and other-race decrement (regressing own-race from other-race performance). First, we demonstrated that own-race faces were processed more holistically than other-race faces, particularly the eye region. Notably, using regression, we showed a significant association between the own-race advantage in recognition memory and the own-race advantage in holistic processing and that these associations were weaker when examining the other-race decrement. We also demonstrated that performance on own- and other-race faces across all of our tasks was highly correlated, suggesting that the differences we found between own- and other-race faces are quantitative rather than qualitative. Together, this suggests that own- and other-race faces recruit largely similar mechanisms, that own-race faces more thoroughly engage holistic processing, and that this greater engagement of holistic processing is significantly associated with the own-race advantage in recognition memory.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Robust Method of Measuring Other-Race and Other-Ethnicity Effects: The Cambridge Face Memory Test FormatPLOS ONE, 2012
- Capturing specific abilities as a window into human individuality: The example of face recognitionCognitive Neuropsychology, 2012
- Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict Face Recognition AbilityPsychological Science, 2012
- Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritableProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification AccuracyPsychological Science, 2009
- Perceptual Other-Race Training Reduces Implicit Racial BiasPLOS ONE, 2009
- Culture Shapes How We Look at FacesPLOS ONE, 2008
- The Other-Race Effect Develops During InfancyPsychological Science, 2007
- Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.Psychological Bulletin, 2007
- Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interactNeuropsychologia, 2006