Functional differences between the human LINE retrotransposon and retroviral reverse transcriptases for invivo mRNA reverse transcription

Abstract

We have analysed the reverse transcriptase (RT) activity of the human LINE retrotransposon and that of two retroviruses, using an in vivo assay within mammalian (murine and human) cells. The assay relies on transfection of the cells with expression vectors for the RT of the corresponding elements and PCR analysis of the DNA extracted 2–4 days post‐transfection using primers bracketing the intronic domains of co‐transfected reporter genes or of cellular genes. This assay revealed high levels of reverse‐transcribed cDNA molecules, with the intron spliced out, with expression vectors for the LINE. Generation of cDNA molecules requires LINE ORF2, whereas ORF1 is dispensable. Deletion derivatives within the 3.8 kb LINE ORF2 allowed further delineation of the RT domain: >0.7 kb at the 5′‐end of the LINE ORF2 is dispensable for reverse transcription, consistent with this domain being an endonuclease‐like domain, as well as 1 kb at the 3′‐end, a putative RNase H domain. Conversely, the RT of the two retroviruses tested, Moloney murine leukemia virus and human immunodeficiency virus, failed to produce similar reverse transcripts. These experiments demonstrate a specific and high efficiency reverse transcription activity for the LINE RT, which applies to RNA with no sequence specificity, including those from cellular genes, and which might therefore be responsible for the endogenous activity that we previously detected within mammalian cells through the formation of pseudogene‐like structures.