Selectivity profile of the novel muscarinic antagonist UH‐AH 37 determined by the use of cloned receptors and isolated tissue preparations
Open Access
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 102 (1), 246-250
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb12161.x
Abstract
1 Functional in vitro experiments were carried out to determine the antimuscarinic potencies of the pirenzepine derivative UH-AH 37 (6-chloro-5,10-dihydro-5-[(1-methyl-4-piperidinyl)acetyl]-11H-dibenzo-[b,e] [1,4] diazepine-11-one hydrochloride) at M1 muscarinic receptors of rabbit vas deferens, M2 receptors of rat left atria and M3 receptors of rat ileum. Furthermore, N-[3H]-methylscopolamine competition binding experiments were performed to obtain its affinities for the five cloned human muscarinic receptors (m1-m5) stably expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Pirenzepine served as a reference drug throughout all experiments. 2 In all preparations used, UH-AH 37 interacted with muscarinic receptors in a fashion characteristic of a simple competitive antagonist. 3 In the functional studies, UH-AH 37, like pirenzepine, showed high affinity for M1 (pA2 8.49) and low affinity for M2 muscarinic receptors (pA2 6.63). In contrast to pirenzepine, UH-AH 37 also displayed high affinity for M3 receptors (pA2 8.04). 4 In agreement with its functional profile, UH-AH 37 bound with highest affinity to m1 (pKi 8.74) and with lowest affinity to m2 receptors (pKi 7.35). Moreover, it showed a 7 fold higher affinity for m3 (pKi 8.19) than for m2 receptors, whereas pirenzepine bound to both receptors with low affinities. 5 The binding affinity of UH-AH 37 for m4 and m5 receptors (pKi 8.32 for both receptors) was only ca. 2.5 fold lower than that for m1 receptors, while the corresponding affinity differences were 6 and 13 fold in case of pirenzepine. 6 In conclusion, the receptor selectivity profile of UH-AH 37 differs clearly from that of its parent compound, pirenzepine, in both functional and radioligand binding studies, the major characteristics being its pronounced M2 (m2)/M3 (m3) selectivity. UH-AH 37 thus represents a useful tool for the further pharmacological characterization of muscarinic receptor subtypes.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Muscarinic receptor differentiationPharmacology & Therapeutics, 1988
- Tissue distribution of mRNAs encoding muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypesFEBS Letters, 1988
- Primary structure of porcine muscarinic acetylcholine receptor III and antagonist binding studiesFEBS Letters, 1988
- 80% of muscarinic receptors expressed by the NB‐OK 1 human neuroblastoma cell line show high affinity for pirenzepine and are comparable to rat hippocampus M1 receptorsFEBS Letters, 1988
- Primary structure of porcine cardiac muscarinic acetylcholine receptor deduced from the cDNA sequenceFEBS Letters, 1986
- Cloning, sequencing and expression of complementary DNA encoding the muscarinic acetylcholine receptorNature, 1986
- Cardioselective profile of AF-DX 116, a muscarine M2 receptor antagonistLife Sciences, 1986
- Binding profile of a novel cardioselective muscarine receptor antagonist, AF-DX 116, to membranes of peripheral tissues and brain in the ratLife Sciences, 1986
- pA2 and receptor differentiation: A statistical analysis of competitive antagonismLife Sciences, 1979
- Relationship between the inhibition constant (KI) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reactionBiochemical Pharmacology, 1973