Prediction of Progression Following Radical Prostatectomy
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Vol. 20 (3), 286-292
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199603000-00004
Abstract
We studied 721 men with clinically confined disease who underwent radical prostatectomy. No patient received preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy or hormone therapy until progression occurred. For those men without progression, the mean follow-up was 6.5 years with a median of 6 years (range 1 to 12 years). Because patients with lymph node metastases or seminal vesicle invasion had such a high risk of progression, enhanced prognostication was not needed in men with these findings. Thus we focused this analysis on the 617 men without lymph node metastases or seminal vesicle invasion. In the multivariate analysis, Gleason score (P < 0.0001), surgical margins (P = 0.004), and capsular penetration (P = 0.007) were all independent predictors of progression. Tumors with a Gleason score of 2 through 4 were almost invariably cured, with a 10-year progression-free risk of 96%. At the opposite end of the spectrum, the 10-year actuarial progression-free risk for men with a Gleason score of 8 through 9 was 35%. Men with Gleason score 2 through 4 or 8 through 9 tumors could not be stratified into different risks of progression based on the presence or extent of capsular penetration or margin status. For the men with Gleason score 5 through 7 tumors (88.2% of cases), predicting their risk of progression was enhanced by knowledge of their tumor's capsular penetration and margin status. Tumors with a Gleason score of 5 through 6 and 7 were each stratified into three groups with different risks of progression. Using the actuarial curves within this study, physicians will be able to more accurately determine a patient's risk of progression following radical prostatectomy based on a combination of the radical prostatectomy Gleason score, extent of capsular penetration, and status of surgical margins of resection.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence for experimental adjuvant therapy following radical prostatectomyUrology, 1995
- Can Radical Prostatectomy Alter the Progression of Poorly Differentiated Prostate Cancer?Journal of Urology, 1994
- Long-Term (15 Years) Results After Radical Prostatectomy For Clinically Localized (Stage T2c Or Lower) Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1994
- The Incidence and Significance of Detectable Levels of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1994
- 5-Year Tumor Recurrence Rates After Anatomical Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy For Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1994
- Impact of Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Clinically Localized DiseaseJournal of Urology, 1994
- Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomyCancer, 1993
- Is Tumor Volume an Independent Predictor of Progression Following Radical Prostatectomy? A Multivariate Analysis of 185 Clinical Stage B Adenocarcinomas of the Prostate with 5 Years of FollowupJournal of Urology, 1993
- Evaluation of Radical Prostatectomy Capsular Margins of ResectionThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1990