Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults.
- 1 June 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychology and Aging
- Vol. 25 (2), 271-288
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019106
Abstract
The authors evaluated the reliability and validity of a tool for measuring older adults' decision-making competence (DMC). A sample of 205 younger adults (25-45 years), 208 young-older adults (65-74 years), and 198 old-older adults (75-97 years) made judgments and decisions related to health, finance, and nutrition. Reliable indices of comprehension, dimension weighting, and cognitive reflection were developed. Comparison of the performance of old-older and young-older adults was possible in this study, unlike previous research. As hypothesized, old-older adults performed more poorly than young-older adults; both groups of older adults performed more poorly than younger adults. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that a large amount of variance in decision performance across age groups (including mean trends) could be accounted for by social variables, health measures, basic cognitive skills, attitudinal measures, and numeracy. Structural equation modeling revealed significant pathways from 3 exogenous latent factors (crystallized intelligence, other cognitive abilities, and age) to the endogenous DMC latent factor. Further research is needed to validate the meaning of performance on these tasks for real-life decision making.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG021451-01A2)
- National Science Foundation (BCS-0525238)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bringing meaning to numbers: The impact of evaluative categories on decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2009
- Assessing Health Numeracy Among Community-Dwelling Older AdultsJournal of Health Communication, 2007
- Perceived self-efficacy and everyday problem solving among young and older adults.Psychology and Aging, 2003
- Reliability of clinical judgment of patients’ competency to give informed consent: A case vignette studyPsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2000
- Everyday cognition: Age and intellectual ability correlates.Psychology and Aging, 1999
- Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996
- Discourse comprehension and problem solving: Decisions about the treatment of breast cancer by women across the life span.Psychology and Aging, 1995
- Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.American Psychologist, 1994
- Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- Assessing Patients' Capacities to Consent to TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988