Paternalism & Its Discontents: Motorcycle Helmet Laws, Libertarian Values, and Public Health
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- other
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 97 (2), 208-217
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2005.083204
Abstract
The history of motorcycle helmet legislation in the United States reflects the extent to which concerns about individual liberties have shaped the public health debate. Despite overwhelming epidemiological evidence that motorcycle helmet laws reduce fatalities and serious injuries, only 20 states currently require all riders to wear helmets. During the past 3 decades, federal government efforts to push states toward enactment of universal helmet laws have faltered, and motorcyclists' advocacy groups have been successful at repealing state helmet laws. This history raises questions about the possibilities for articulating an ethics of public health that would call upon government to protect citizens from their own choices that result in needless morbidity and suffering.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lawrence of Arabia, Sir Hugh Cairns, and the Origin of Motorcycle HelmetsNeurosurgery, 2002
- Compliance with the 1992 California motorcycle helmet use law.American Journal of Public Health, 1995
- The Economics of Safety Deregulation: Lives and Dollars Lost Due to Repeal of Motorcycle Helmet LawsJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1983
- Freedom and protection: a balancing of interests.American Journal of Public Health, 1981
- Perspective on the public good.American Journal of Public Health, 1981
- The repeal of helmet use laws and increased motorcyclist mortality in the United States, 1975-1978.American Journal of Public Health, 1980
- On lobbies, liberty, and the public good.American Journal of Public Health, 1980
- ObituaryThe Lancet, 1952
- Crash HelmetsBMJ, 1946
- Head Injuries in Motor-cyclists: with Special Reference to Crash HelmetsBMJ, 1943