Office and Field Diagnosis of Neurotoxic Disease
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of the American College of Toxicology
- Vol. 8 (2), 311-319
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10915818909019555
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of neurotoxic disease requires a fundamental knowledge of the principles of neurology, epidemiology, and toxicology. The cardinal features of the office evaluation of this condition are the detailed history and meticulous clinical examination of an individual; the examination focuses on detecting naturally occurring disease that may account for or mask the principal signs and symptoms. Specialized diagnostic tests can provide an important complement to the office evaluation but are often nonspecific for neurotoxic disease. Field assessment, in contrast, rarely utilizes detailed examinations and depends heavily on quantitative screening tools, such as questionaires, tremor analysis, computer-assisted neurobehavioral tests, and quantitative sensory tests. Field studies generally have two goals: the identification of population cohort differences and the detection of individual members of a group that differ from a population or the expected norm. No single procedure is optimal for all field studies; rather, the methods and analyses should be tailored for the population and toxin under study.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recognizing neurotoxic diseaseNeurology, 1987
- Screening Occupational Populations for Asymptomatic or Early Peripheral NeuropathyJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1986
- An Improved Method for Measuring Heart-Rate Variability: Assessment of Cardiac Autonomic FunctionBiometrics, 1984
- The acute sensory neuronopathy syndrome: A distinct clinical entityAnnals of Neurology, 1980