Generalization of Motor Learning Depends on the History of Prior Action
Open Access
- 12 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Biology
- Vol. 4 (10), e316
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040316
Abstract
Generalization of motor learning refers to our ability to apply what has been learned in one context to other contexts. When generalization is beneficial, it is termed transfer, and when it is detrimental, it is termed interference. Insight into the mechanism of generalization may be acquired from understanding why training transfers in some contexts but not others. However, identifying relevant contextual cues has proven surprisingly difficult, perhaps because the search has mainly been for cues that are explicit. We hypothesized instead that a relevant contextual cue is an implicit memory of action with a particular body part. To test this hypothesis we considered a task in which participants learned to control motion of a cursor under visuomotor rotation in two contexts: by moving their hand through motion of their shoulder and elbow, or through motion of their wrist. Use of these contextual cues led to three observations: First, in naive participants, learning in the wrist context was much faster than in the arm context. Second, generalization was asymmetric so that arm training benefited subsequent wrist training, but not vice versa. Third, in people who had prior wrist training, generalization from the arm to the wrist was blocked. That is, prior wrist training appeared to prevent both the interference and transfer that subsequent arm training should have caused. To explain the data, we posited that the learner collected statistics of contextual history: all upper arm movements also move the hand, but occasionally we move our hands without moving the upper arm. In a Bayesian framework, history of limb segment use strongly affects parameter uncertainty, which is a measure of the covariance of the contextual cues. This simple Bayesian prior dictated a generalization pattern that largely reproduced all three findings. For motor learning, generalization depends on context, which is determined by the statistics of how we have previously used the various parts of our limbs.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Implicit Plan Overrides an Explicit Strategy during Visuomotor AdaptationJournal of Neuroscience, 2006
- Erratum: Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the handNature Neuroscience, 2004
- Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the handNature Neuroscience, 2004
- A Gain-Field Encoding of Limb Position and Velocity in the Internal Model of Arm DynamicsPLoS Biology, 2003
- Context-Dependent Anticipation of Different Task Dynamics: Rapid Recall of Appropriate Motor Skills Using Visual CuesJournal of Neurophysiology, 2003
- Patterns of Interference in Sequence Learning and Prism Adaptation Inconsistent With the Consolidation HypothesisLearning & Memory, 2002
- Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in a motor working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2002
- Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in a motor working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2002
- Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: Implications for models of adaptation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1994
- A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction ProblemsJournal of Basic Engineering, 1960