Body mass index and waist circumference independently contribute to the prediction of nonabdominal, abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 75 (4), 683-688
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/75.4.683
Abstract
Background: It is unknown whether the ability of waist circumference (WC) to predict health risk beyond that predicted by body mass index (BMI) alone is explained in part by the ability of WC to identify those with elevated concentrations of total or abdominal fat. Objective: We sought to determine whether BMI and WC independently contribute to the prediction of nonabdominal (total fat − abdominal fat), abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat. Design: Fat distribution was measured by magnetic resonance imaging in 341 white men and women. Multiple regression analysis was performed to measure whether the combination of BMI and WC explained a greater variance in nonabdominal, abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat than did BMI or WC alone. These fat depots were also compared after a subdivision of the cohort into 3 BMI (normal, overweight, and class I obese) and 3 WC (low, intermediate, and high) categories according to the classification system used to identify associations between BMI, WC, and health risk. Results: Independent of age and sex, the combination of BMI and WC explained a greater variance in nonabdominal, abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat than did either BMI or WC alone (P < 0.05). For nonabdominal and abdominal subcutaneous fat, BMI was the strongest correlate; thus, by adding BMI to WC, the variance accrued was greater than when WC was added to BMI. However, when WC was added to BMI, the added variance explained for visceral fat was greater than when BMI was added to WC. Furthermore, within each of the 3 BMI categories studied, an increase in the WC category was associated with an increase in visceral fat (P < 0.05). Conclusions: BMI and WC independently contribute to the prediction of nonabdominal, abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat in white men and women. These observations reinforce the importance of using both BMI and WC in clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abdominal Adiposity and Coronary Heart Disease in WomenJAMA, 1998
- Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographyJournal of Applied Physiology, 1998
- Influence of diet and exercise on skeletal muscle and visceral adipose tissue in menJournal of Applied Physiology, 1996
- Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sampleBMJ, 1995
- Pathophysiology and Pathogenesis of Visceral Fat ObesityObesity Research, 1995
- Obesity, Fat Distribution, and Weight Gain as Risk Factors for Clinical Diabetes in MenDiabetes Care, 1994
- Quantification of adipose tissue by MRI: relationship with anthropometric variablesJournal of Applied Physiology, 1992
- Regional obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease; the Framingham studyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease.Arteriosclerosis: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association, Inc., 1990
- The Influence of Body Fat Distribution on the Incidence of Diabetes Mellitus: 13.5 Years of Follow-up of the Participants in the Study of Men Born in 1913Diabetes, 1985